The Ismailis: From the Fatimid Caliphate to the Assassins
The Ismailis are a Shia offshoot whose theology includes a hidden imam, esoteric interpretation of the Quran, and doctrines accessible only to initiates. Their political history includes the Fatimid caliphate (which allied with the Crusaders against Sunni Islam) and the Assassin order, which used targeted killing as a religious-political weapon.
Contents
The Theological Core
The Ismailis are a branch of Shia Islam who accepted only seven imams (the seventh being Ismail ibn Jafar al-Sadiq) and developed a distinctive theology around the concept of batiniyya: the belief that every outward (zahir) aspect of the Quran has a hidden inner (batin) meaning accessible only through the infallible imam.
This doctrine has several destructive consequences. First, it removes the Quran from the reach of ordinary Muslims, its true meaning is hidden unless the imam reveals it. Second, it makes the imam the indispensable intermediary between God and the believer. Third, it creates a closed theological system immune to external critique: any Quranic evidence against Ismaili positions can be reinterpreted through the batini framework.
Al-Ghazali wrote Fada'ih al-Batiniyya (The Scandals of the Batinis) specifically to refute this framework, demonstrating that it dissolves the Quran's meaning entirely and produces a system where the imam's word supersedes the text.
The Fatimid Caliphate
The Fatimids established a caliphate in North Africa (909 CE) and subsequently conquered Egypt (969 CE), where they founded Cairo. They claimed descent from Fatima, the Prophet's daughter (a claim contested by genealogists) and used this claim to legitimise a rival caliphate to the Abbasids.
The Fatimid caliphate was Ismaili in theology and actively promoted Ismaili doctrine as state religion. Their relationship with the Sunni majority they governed was one of political pragmatism externally and ideological hostility internally; they maintained an apparatus of Ismaili propagandists (du'at) working to convert Sunni Muslims and undermine Abbasid authority.
Their historical significance in the context of the Crusades: when the First Crusade approached Jerusalem in 1099, the Fatimids had recently retaken the city from the Seljuks (1098). They made no serious alliance with other Muslim forces to defend it, having expelled the Seljuks who would have been the natural defenders. The Crusaders took Jerusalem. The Fatimids proposed alliance with the Crusaders against the Seljuks.
Salah al-Din al-Ayyubi understood that the liberation of Jerusalem required first the elimination of the Fatimid caliphate. He dismantled it in 1171, returning Egypt to Sunni governance. Only then (with Egypt united under Sunni rule) was the liberation of Jerusalem possible. Hattin (1187) and the recovery of Jerusalem followed sixteen years after he ended the Fatimid caliphate.
This sequence is not coincidental. The Fatimid caliphate was an obstacle to the Muslim ummah's ability to respond to the Crusader presence. Its elimination was a prerequisite for Islamic recovery.
The Assassins (Nizari Ismailis)
After the Fatimid line was contested, Hassan-i Sabbah established a separate Ismaili movement in Persia: the Nizari Ismailis, known in history as the Assassins (Hashasheen). From their fortress at Alamut in northern Persia, they developed targeted political assassination as a religious-political tool.
Their theology combined standard Ismaili batini doctrine with Hassan-i Sabbah's own innovations, including the reported claim (at the height of Alamut) that the law was suspended for his followers. Their targets included Sunni rulers, scholars, and Crusader leaders alike; they were instruments of chaos rather than participants in any coherent Islamic project.
The Nizari state at Alamut was destroyed by the Mongols in 1256, two years before the destruction of Baghdad. The Assassins had spent decades undermining Sunni political stability. They contributed to the fragmentation that made the Mongol invasions easier to execute.
Contemporary Ismailism
The contemporary Nizari Ismaili community, led by the Aga Khan, has significantly moderated from its historical positions. However, the foundational theological deviations remain: the belief in the living imam as the indispensable guide to the religion's meaning, the esoteric interpretation framework, and the elevation of the imam to a position that Islamic theology reserves for prophets.
Modern Ismaili communities are present in Muslim communities across Europe and North America, often encountered as fellow Muslims at interfaith events, in Islamic studies programmes, or in general conversation. Understanding where their theological framework departs from Sunni Islam helps Muslims engage with them accurately and with proper Islamic adab, rather than treating them uncritically as fellow Sunni Muslims or dismissing them with uninformed hostility.
Scholar References
- Al-Ghazali, Fada'ih al-Batiniyya: refutation of Ismaili theology
- Ibn Kathir, al-Bidaya wal-Nihaya: on the Fatimid caliphate and the Crusades
- Bernard Lewis, The Assassins: historical account of the Nizari order
- Ibn Taymiyyah: on the Batiniyya and their theological errors
- Historical sources on Salah al-Din and the dismantling of the Fatimid caliphate